State GOP getting Ready to Sell Conservatism down the River

January 28, 2012

Well,, it looks like the State GOP is going to fold like a House of Cards on the redistricting suit, probably costing the GOP 2-3 Congressional seats, 1-2 State Senate seats and probably a half-dozen State Rep seats.  Here is a good article about the state of this whole ludicrous process.  They are going to concede all of this- apparently to prevent the election being delayed into the summer months.  And they are doing it with a Friday-night ‘document dump’ revelation, to avoid getting any blowback from the rank-and file that might scuttle the deal, emulating the Obama administration in doing so.

Certainly we would ALL like the earlier primary date of April 3rd, to have more influence in the Presidential Primary cycle.  But that alone is not enough to justify giving up so many seats for a decade to maybe get a primary 2 months earlier (and before mandated conventions).

One other factor comes into play: the nature of the current races between ‘establishment’ and conservative ‘rebels’. In the top race of the the ticket; polling has had Dewhurst on top- but Ted Cruz gaining rapidly as his name recognition and positions become better known.  Other challenges across the state against long established officeholder are also gaining ground (like Matt Beebe against Straus).  Also, the non-Austin-beholding candidates in the open races are doing well (many open because ‘old hands’ fled from a combination of the upcoming challenges and the nightmare that the next session budgeting will be because of the HUGE mess left behind by the last session’s leadership).

An election held in the summer, even runoffs, are a distinct disadvantage for the ‘powers that be’, who require a lot of ‘casual’ voters that base their decisions on standard campaign material, rather than a more serious study of politics.   The ‘rebels’ would have more time for the grassroots approach to work its magic and turn out their more committed (but quantitatively lesser) supporters.

So, to save their bacon for now (ESPECIALLY the Senate seat), they will to cut a deal to the long-term detriment of conservatives nation-wide.  And for that, leadership- Party and elected- should pay a steep price.  If anyone locates a bunch of spines somewhere in the Austin area or principle lying on the streets of Austin, please return them to the GOP Headquarters for the owners to reclaim them.

The main hypocrisy here is that the redrawing of the lines has NOTHING to do with minority representation and EVERYTHING to do with Party representation.  If that were not true, why were the Democrat-drawn maps of the courts making it difficult for ethnic minorities like James White and Aaron Pena- who happen to be in the GOP- to be re-elected and at the same time designed to salvage Anglos like Sen. Davis and Rep. Doggett, who happen to be Democrat?  The dirty little secret is it is Republicans who sometimes elect minorities in Anglo-centric districts while it is the Democrat who sometimes elect Anglos in minority-centric districts.  THAT is something never brought before the courts- and should be as a sign that Section 5 should be done away with as a discriminatory practice based on ancient history no longer relevant.

If Texas districts were drawn for TRUE maximization of ethnic representation, there would be essentially NO Anglo democrats outside of Austin itself- and a significant number of minority GOP members.  But it’s REALLY all about DEMOCRAT power.  And the establishment Republicans are going to bow to that for their own purposes.


Survey Results: MSM’s Romney ‘Inevitability’ Meme Rejected

January 12, 2012

In the largest response to a North Texas Tea Party membership survey, respondents apparently are NOT buying into the media and national pundits’ sales pitch of the ‘inevitability’ of Mitt Romney being the nominee.  (Full survey results can be found here)  Mitt pulled a miserable 9.7% for a 4th-place finish, well behind Rick Santorum (35.4%), Newt Gingrich (27.7%) and even Rick Perry (13.1%), only bypassing Ron Paul (8.3%) and Jon Huntsman (1%).

It appears that just maybe some people don’t think a couple hundred thousand people in Iowa and New Hampshire should control the electoral destiny of this nation.  And, while none of the candidate’s are perfect, each should be looked at clear-eyed, without the blinders the media and the political establishment in the Northeast would have us wear.  The presidential primary is only over if we want those two elite groups running things for us.


Another No-Brainer, for Different Reasons

January 8, 2012

In the case of the State Senate race in District 2, the incumbent Bob Deuell’s record could not be more clear.  His record for fiscal responsibility, which has moved  from the previous dismal level, to downright appalling this last session, earning a Democrat-level F from EmpowerTexans and a 45% economic score from Heritage Alliance .

He has one individual who had the courage to run against this long-time incumbent; Bob Hall.  And there is no question of Bob Hall’s commitment to fiscal responsibility, as any conservative from the Dallas area out through East Texas.  Bob has been extremely active in the Tea Party movement, his calm and knowledgeable voice often heard at meetings, rallies and candidate forums.  A retired Air zForce veteren and aerospace engineer, the ‘Right’ Bob has the experience wisdom, and principles desperately needed in the Texas Senate.  So the North Texas Tea Party is proud to TeaApprove Bob Hall for Texas State Senate, District 2.

    


Holidays are over; back the the Business of TeaApproval

January 4, 2012

… And the first one is a no-brainer, based on his long history of working for the conservative cause, having one of the highest conservative ratings of any state legislator, and a proven willingness to stick his political neck out to change how Austin works (which is a serious impediment to true conservative governance).  There is little point of droning on and on about his many accomplishments that are already well-know to all conservatives of Collin County; we’ll just cut to the chase:

The North Texas Tea Party enthusiastically TeaApproves Ken Paxton for the State Senate, District 8

        


Daily Linkfest

June 2, 2011

It’s TeaApproval time again!

December 23, 2011

It’s time to start announcing the results of our on-going efforts to review State and County-level candidates and officeholders in preparation for the upcoming Primaries (which are currently slated for April 3, but is very likely to be pushed back into May to allow counties to make whatever adjustment they need to for whatever maps are finalized).

It will be a tough year to vet candidates for TeaApproval‘; now that the Tea Parties have proven to have influence, EVERYONE will be persuasive in proclaiming they are the best champion of our 5 Principles.  But the bar will be higher this year; more emphasis will be placed on nonverbal information, on associations and actions- as well as will and determination to take on how ‘things are done’, which we realize is a major part of the inability to create REAL change. Emphasis will also be placed on an understanding of the office sought and how things function in the realm the office resides in.  Lastly , considerable consideration of candidate viability and whether a candidate has a winnable game plan in terms of strategy, organization, potential resources, and timely appplication of each.

The process is ongoing, but will be limited: there are a LOT of open seats (as the old hands run for the hills to avoid dealing with the mess they left behind) and therefore a LOT MORE candidates.  Only contested races will be considered this time around and the ones either most relevant or with the most impact.  Indeed, this year, the results of the process will not be set in stone, in many cases of non-officeholders, until all the associations (and their influence through campaign financing) are reviewed.

Naturally, additional candidates may appear or candidates may shift races or even drop out dependent on the finalized districts.  However, being more than one TeaApproval is possible in any given race (but efforts will be made to limit it this cycle), it changes nothing of the determination we will make before the districts are finalized.

A few determinations will be ‘slam-dunks’ and we’ll be announcing those quickly, with a little of the reasoning behind them.

Check back at this site for the announcements! (Or like our Facebook page to track it there)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.